Making Sense In the Mess: Leadership for a Turbulent Time
Daniel Atlin as a guest on The Nonprofit Exchange, hosted by Hugh Ballou.
Originally published by The Nonprofit Exchange (Hugh Ballou). This page analyses Daniel Atlin's appearance; the audio below is the show's own.
8 September 2026 · 26 min · as at 2026-09-08
Hugh Ballou (host) · Daniel Atlin (guest)
The Nonprofit Exchange feed (RSS) · MP3
About the guest
Daniel Atlin
strategic advisor, executive coach, and leadership researcher
Strategic advisor and executive coach with more than 30 years of senior leadership experience across post-secondary education, cooperatives and government; completed an executive master's through Oxford and HEC Paris researching how university leaders use sensemaking; hosts the podcast Messy.
Guest details come from the published episode notes or the guest's own words in the episode.
Episode analysis
Analysis by AI, drawn only from this episode; every point links to the moment it rests on.
Hugh Ballou talks with Daniel Atlin, a strategic advisor and executive coach whose Oxford and HEC Paris research looked at how university leaders use sensemaking. Daniel argues that the mess of modern leadership, from AI and economic uncertainty to polarization and reduced trust, is mostly to be navigated rather than solved, and that certainty is often fiction. He describes inner sensemaking (awareness of your own stress, biases and reactions) and outer sensemaking (reading others and building a shared map), anchored in purpose. The conversation also covers leaders as stewards, short directional strategic plans, the art of subtraction, the serenity prayer, and a rapid-fire round on habits and influences.
Key ideas
- Daniel argues the mess is mostly something to be navigated, not a problem to be solved, so leadership is increasingly about making sense of uncertainty rather than simply making decisions. [02:39]▸ [03:19]▸ [03:19]▸ [03:49]▸
- Daniel says leaders have been sold a cult of decisive, certain personalities, while in complex organizations certainty is often fiction. [04:33]▸ [04:57]▸ [05:02]▸
- Daniel describes sensemaking as exploring data, emotions and reactions to build a constantly updated map and narrative, like a Google map refreshed with new information. [06:55]▸ [08:07]▸ [08:40]▸ [08:41]▸
- Daniel splits sensemaking into inner work on your own stress, biases and reactions and outer work with others through exploration and map making, both anchored in purpose. [10:30]▸ [10:56]▸ [11:22]▸ [11:46]▸
- Daniel argues people want to be brought along rather than directed, and leaders should not get too far ahead of their people. [07:20]▸ [07:21]▸ [12:47]▸ [12:59]▸
- Daniel sees leaders as stewards rather than the organization itself, and says strategic plans should belong to the organization and survive the person. [16:27]▸ [16:27]▸ [16:35]▸ [17:40]▸
- Daniel prefers short, directional strategic plans used to decide what to take on or let go, and says nonprofits struggle with the art of subtraction. [18:10]▸ [18:25]▸ [21:32]▸ [21:51]▸ [22:11]▸
- Daniel argues leaders get caught up trying to control what they cannot, and recommends the serenity prayer and asking what they are missing. [23:50]▸ [24:06]▸ [24:40]▸ [24:49]▸ [24:57]▸
Inner and outer sensemaking anchored in purpose (as Daniel describes it)
- Anchor in purpose: your own purpose tied to the purpose of the institution you lead.
- Inner sensemaking: be aware of how you show up, your reactions under stress, and your biases.
- Take a pause to understand things when they are moving too quickly.
- Outer sensemaking: see how others interact, gather data through exploration and map making, and create a story.
- Cultivate your team and organization to be better improvisers and inventors.
- Bridge divides by being adaptive and collaborative.
As described in the episode: [10:30]▸ [10:56]▸ [11:22]▸ [11:46]▸
Lessons
- Daniel suggests that simply naming the mess helps leaders; a university president thanked him for doing exactly that. [10:11]▸ [10:17]▸
- Daniel recommends building self-awareness through journaling, voice notes to yourself, and reviewing how you behaved when things went wrong or well. [13:29]▸ [14:38]▸
- Daniel advises creating a personal resilience story about what got you out of past low points. [13:29]▸ [15:15]▸
- Daniel says planning should be ongoing and tinkered with, not a once-a-year exercise blessed by the board. [21:32]▸ [22:11]▸
- Daniel says a sign of over-control is being unable to hear signals in the room that run contrary to your direction. [24:57]▸
Who it's for
Nonprofit executives, clergy, board members and other purpose-driven leaders facing uncertainty who want a way to think about leading without false certainty, build self-awareness, and rethink rigid strategic planning.
Facts stated in the episode
- The host says Daniel has more than 30 years of senior leadership experience across post-secondary education, cooperatives and government. [01:42]▸
- The host says Daniel completed an executive master's through Oxford and HEC Paris, researching how university leaders use sensemaking. [01:50]▸
- Daniel names Viktor Frankl's Man's Search for Meaning and Leadership on the Line by Heifetz as key influences. [25:14]▸
- Daniel prefers strategic plans of about three years with three or four key directions. [18:25]▸
Questions this episode answers
- What is the 'mess' that leaders face today?Daniel lists technological change and AI, economic uncertainty, polarization, changing expectations of institutions, reduced trust, resource constraints, competing stakeholders and information overload, and says most of it is to be navigated rather than solved. [02:39]▸ [02:47]▸ [03:19]▸
- Why shouldn't leaders wait for certainty before acting?Daniel says leaders have been sold a cult of decisive personalities, but in complex organizations certainty is often fiction and things move too fast for leaders to have complete information. [04:33]▸ [04:57]▸
- What does sensemaking mean in practice?Daniel calls it the work of understanding what is going on so you can decide what to do next, exploring data, emotions and reactions to build a map that is constantly updated. [06:55]▸ [08:07]▸ [08:40]▸
- What is the difference between inner and outer sensemaking?Daniel describes inner sensemaking as making sense of yourself, your stress and biases, and outer sensemaking as making sense with others through exploration and map making, both anchored in purpose. [10:30]▸ [10:56]▸ [11:22]▸ [11:46]▸
- How can a leader improve self-awareness?Daniel recommends self-reflective activities like journaling or voice notes, noticing how you respond to failure and success, and creating a personal resilience story. [13:29]▸ [14:38]▸ [15:15]▸
- How long should a nonprofit strategic plan be?Daniel prefers plans of maybe three years, directional, with three or four key things, used to decide what to take on or let go, rather than five-to-ten-year laundry lists. [16:27]▸ [18:10]▸ [18:25]▸
- What is the art of subtraction?Daniel says nonprofits struggle to remove things that are less important than they were last year and to reposition resources, so planning should be ongoing. [21:32]▸ [21:51]▸ [22:11]▸
- What question should leaders ask more often?Daniel's answer: 'What am I not seeing? What am I missing here?' [24:49]▸
- Where can an overwhelmed leader start?Daniel points to the serenity prayer, saying leaders most often get caught up trying to control things they have no control over. [23:50]▸ [24:06]▸
In their own words
Longer stretches of the conversation, word for word from the transcript, turn by turn.
What the mess of leadership actually is
Note (AI): Daniel lists the forces behind today's complexity and reframes leadership as navigating rather than solving, setting up the whole episode.
Daniel Atlin, guest · [02:39]Thanks, Hugh, and it's great to be here with you today. So let me just say that the mess is not one thing, it's actually a multiple, list of things. It's about technological, change in AI, economic uncertainty, it's about polarization, changing expectations of institutions, along that with, with reduced trust and, resource constraints. It's about multiple stakeholders who want different things, and of course, you know, like all of …
Read the full passage (195 words, 02:39–03:57)
Daniel Atlin, guest · [02:39]Thanks, Hugh, and it's great to be here with you today. So let me just say that the mess is not one thing, it's actually a multiple, list of things. It's about technological, change in AI, economic uncertainty, it's about polarization, changing expectations of institutions, along that with, with reduced trust and, resource constraints. It's about multiple stakeholders who want different things, and of course, you know, like all of us, an information overload. And it's about people themselves who are bringing fear, History and fatigue and other expectations into the system. So the mess is not necessarily a problem waiting to be solved. It's actually most of it is much to be navigated. So, you know, we've spent lots of time talking about leaders needing to be able to solve problems, but many of the things that we're, that are happening today are things that actually can't be solved by any leaders. So there are situations involving competing values, incomplete information, changing conditions, and a multitude of different people who see the world differently. So leadership is increasingly the view of making sense of the uncertainty that we're in, rather than simply making decisions.
Habits of a strong sensemaking leader: inner and outer
Note (AI): The core explanation of inner and outer sensemaking anchored by purpose, which Daniel says is at the heart of his research.
Hugh Ballou, host · [10:30]It, it can drive us into a culture where everybody wants to be critical or blaming because they're afraid of the uncertainty. So take a minute and, and describe, the practical habits of a leader who is a strong Sensemaker. …
Read the full passage (328 words, 10:30–12:19)
Hugh Ballou, host · [10:30]It, it can drive us into a culture where everybody wants to be critical or blaming because they're afraid of the uncertainty. So take a minute and, and describe, the practical habits of a leader who is a strong Sensemaker.
Daniel Atlin, guest · [10:50]So I think, you know, that's a great question, Hugh, and, and it's at the heart of my research as well. So, you know, a great Sensemaking leader does two things, you know, at the same time, and they're anchored, it's anchored by purpose, and that's the purpose of yourself, but also tied to the purpose of the institution you're leading as well. And it's actually about, you know, making sense of, of yourself, and that's what I call sort of inner Sensemaking. So it's being aware of actually how you show up. It's being aware of, of, of, you know, what you're observing around you as well, and how you're observing your own reactions. It's about recognizing how you show up under stress. It's recognizing the biases that you have that you bring into the table as well. And it's also taking a pause you need to be able to understand things when, when things are going too quickly. As well. And then it's also about, making sense with others too. And that's about, you know, trying to sort of see how others are, are interacting together too. And you do this through things like, you know, exploration and map making, where you actually gather all the data together, pull it all together, create a story. but it's also all about how you actually can, can cultivate things that, that, that are within your team and your organization to being better improvisers and inventors as well. And finally, I think, I think it's really important, as you say, to bridge divides by being adaptive and, and a collaborator too. So, so it's two things together, which actually are, are, create a, actually a really great, sense-making leader.
Building self-awareness through reflection and resilience stories
Note (AI): Concrete practices for self-awareness: journaling, voice notes, reviewing failures and successes, and a personal resilience story.
Hugh Ballou, host · [13:29]And we assume people remember the same things we remember, and so the purpose, I find that it's important that we all remember our purpose, our guiding principles, what, what is it that, that binds us together in our, what we value and what the results that we value. so let's, building on what you said about the inner Sensemaking, so we've got these things that come into our world …
Read the full passage (391 words, 13:29–15:38)
Hugh Ballou, host · [13:29]And we assume people remember the same things we remember, and so the purpose, I find that it's important that we all remember our purpose, our guiding principles, what, what is it that, that binds us together in our, what we value and what the results that we value. so let's, building on what you said about the inner Sensemaking, so we've got these things that come into our world like fear, disappointment, fatigue, and then Our self-awareness, you talked about that too, so let's blend these two ideas together. So we've got these things that happen to us, just had a death in the family, that's an emotional reaction. Just got back from a long weekend with relatives, celebrate my birthday, that's, you know, I'm tired today. So we show up, we're not the perfect human being, so giving ourselves a little breathing room, but then there's that. So how do we have self-awareness? We talked about the blind spots, the biases, well I put that blind spots with biases, so there's things we don't see. How do we improve that self-awareness and deal with all these emotional issues that come to us?
Daniel Atlin, guest · [14:37]Yeah, great question. And I think a lot of that is done through, you know, self-reflective activities, whether it's journaling, whether it's actually sending voice notes to yourself. You know, it's going through some exercise and actually noticing what you did when, you know, things went wrong in your life. or when things went really well. So they'll teach you about, you know, you know, what, what, what, where you tend to go when, when, you, you experience failure or exhaustion perhaps. So it's actually being aware of, of what got you here, and, but recognizing that those things may show up actually when you're in a similar situation. And I think sometimes it's, you know, creating as well your own sort of personal resilience story about, you know, understanding when you had a point, and perhaps when you were at one of your low points, perhaps in your life or in your career, what did you do to actually, you know, you know, get out of that, right? And maybe it was actually took, took a while, maybe it would took time with friends, but realizing what I think carries you through, is so, so important.
Leaders as stewards and the limits of long strategic plans
Note (AI): Useful for boards and executives: separating leader identity from the organization and preferring short, directional plans used as filters.
Daniel Atlin, guest · [16:27]I think it's important for leaders to understand, especially in nonprofit organizations or, or, or, or in, in, in, in clerical situations, that you're the steward. You're not the organization itself. And so oftentimes, you know, in other organizations, those get conflated and, and, and, and can be seen as the same thing. But you realize that you're actually there by your position, you're there because of your experience that …
Read the full passage (438 words, 16:27–18:48)
Daniel Atlin, guest · [16:27]I think it's important for leaders to understand, especially in nonprofit organizations or, or, or, or in, in, in, in clerical situations, that you're the steward. You're not the organization itself. And so oftentimes, you know, in other organizations, those get conflated and, and, and, and can be seen as the same thing. But you realize that you're actually there by your position, you're there because of your experience that you bring as well and what you've achieved, but you're also there by the grace of the other people that, that, that are in the organization as well. So it's the trust that's been created too. So I think, you know, it's important to recognize that effective leaders really care about, passionately be able to know the mission of the organization, but they realize that they are the stewards and their personal identity is important because it gives them credibility, but it doesn't have to be wrapped up in the organization. But I think also organizations can actually, you know, make people conflate this together too, because you have boards sometimes that say to a new, a new sort of, executive director or a leader of an organization, create a strategic plan for me. And then it actually, that plan almost becomes, you know, personified, right? It almost becomes the, the product and, and the position of, of the person rather than the organization. So I think boards have to flip that around and say that, you know what, this, this strategic plan is actually for the organization, not for the person, and it should actually survive perhaps the position, the person in that position.
Hugh Ballou, host · [17:54]So we also have the danger of getting locked in without being flexible. So this self-awareness has multiple, multiple layers and multiple, impact on human beings, right?
Daniel Atlin, guest · [18:07]Absolutely it does. Cause you're right, you know, I, I'm not a huge flat, fan of these Massive five-year to ten-year strategic plans, especially done in academic institutions, there tend to be laundry lists of, of initiatives you're already doing, and they want to satisfy all the different sort of internal, stakeholders. I think, you know, instead it's better to have a strategic plan that's, maybe three years long, and maybe it's actually directional with, with three, or four different sort of, sort of key things, and that are, that actually provides a framework as well for you to answer what new thing that's coming up should we take on or should we let go? It's actually a tool for you to determine, you know, you know, what to actually use and what to actually discard.
The leader as anchor in turbulence, via Bowen
Note (AI): Connects Bowen family systems to Daniel's view that leaders must process organizational tension without being derailed by their own emotions.
Hugh Ballou, host · [19:01]So let's talk about, Psychologist, psychiatrist, excuse me, Murray Bowen, had the concept of Bowen family systems. It's the antithesis of Freud and Jung, but it's, it's, it's about leadership, really, and he has his eight concepts, and he talks in there about differentiation of self and remaining calm. So the leader in your system is the anchor in a, in a period of turbulence, and, and Bowen says our …
Read the full passage (382 words, 19:01–21:03)
Hugh Ballou, host · [19:01]So let's talk about, Psychologist, psychiatrist, excuse me, Murray Bowen, had the concept of Bowen family systems. It's the antithesis of Freud and Jung, but it's, it's, it's about leadership, really, and he has his eight concepts, and he talks in there about differentiation of self and remaining calm. So the leader in your system is the anchor in a, in a period of turbulence, and, and Bowen says our anxiety is transmitted through the whole culture, and it comes back to us, and then we have triangles and relationships, and the anxiety goes around the triangles. So talk about the leader being the anchor in time of turbulence.
Daniel Atlin, guest · [19:44]absolutely. I think, I think somebody, had described it quite well to me, I think, and they said the leader has to hold the uncertainty and tension on behalf of the organization. So in some ways, I, I think that they have to be the one that actually, you know, Deals with some, some of this, this negative, I guess, karma sometimes that's, that's out there and be able to actually be able to, to, to process that as well. Not take it on necessarily, but be able to process it. And that I think is why it's especially important that inner sense making, you know, which is making sense of yourself, because you're aware that you have to actually process this. You're aware that you actually have to sit with it sometimes. Sometimes you have to find a way to push it to the side. Sometimes the way you have to, you have to find a way to reframe it as well. But it's so important because, and I don't think leaders are, are traditionally taught this as much, Hugh, that, that the importance of making sense of yourself actually, you know, when you were in an organization. But when you think about it, organizations are all, you know, just, just collections of people. And as you say, one person's reaction has a multiple effect on, on, on those network of people that you're associated with. So therefore, especially the leader has got this real power of emotions that can actually derail things, I'd say, and actually creates a little bit of challenges for an organization if they're not aware of it.
Trial and error and the art of subtraction
Note (AI): Explains why nonprofits struggle to stop doing things and why planning should be continuous rather than an annual board exercise.
Daniel Atlin, guest · [21:32]Well, if I had the magic answer for that, I'd be, I'd be, I think, you know, you know, Sitting on a beach somewhere, I think. you know, and I, and I think that the real answer is, is trial and error, Hugh. I, I, I think, you know, you have to make certain that you're not exhausting, you know, you know, you know, the organization, as you say, by …
Read the full passage (188 words, 21:32–22:28)
Daniel Atlin, guest · [21:32]Well, if I had the magic answer for that, I'd be, I'd be, I think, you know, you know, Sitting on a beach somewhere, I think. you know, and I, and I think that the real answer is, is trial and error, Hugh. I, I, I think, you know, you have to make certain that you're not exhausting, you know, you know, you know, the organization, as you say, by taking on too much as well. I think organizations, especially, you know, social purpose organizations, nonprofits, et cetera, have a problem with that art of subtraction, taking out things actually that, that are not necessarily perhaps as important today as they were last year, and recognizing to reframe and reposition resources, you know, to go, to go forward. So that's why that sort of map making and actually strategic planning should be ongoing rather than actually an exercise that goes once a year and gets blessed to the board. It actually needs to be continually, I'd say, you know, addressed and tinkered with to be able to make certain that, you know, you're actually have the right framework.
Quotes
“So the mess is not necessarily a problem waiting to be solved.”
“And in generally complex organizations, certainty is often fiction.”
“so we say none of us is as smart as all of us.”
“don't, don't get too far ahead of your people because you might be, thought of as an, as the enemy.”
“it's like creating, you know, an online sort of Google map that's constantly being updated and refined”
“thank you for actually just even naming the mess, because it actually was so helpful in itself.”
“that you're the steward. You're not the organization itself.”
“the leader has to hold the uncertainty and tension on behalf of the organization.”
“I think believing they can control things.”
“What am I not seeing? What am I missing here?”
“the, the, the website link is www dot djasensemaking dot com, and you'll find there some information about me, my podcast, and what I offer as well.”
“Purpose and people.”
What was said, by topic
Guest background
“He brings more than 30 years of senior leadership experience across post-secondary education, cooperatives, government.”
“Daniel completed an executive master's degree through Oxford and HCAC in Paris, where his research examined how university leaders use sense-making to lead through complexity and build high-performing teams.”
The mess of leadership
“It's about technological, change in AI, economic uncertainty, it's about polarization, changing expectations of institutions, along that with, with reduced trust and, resource constraints.”
“So the mess is not necessarily a problem waiting to be solved. It's actually most of it is much to be navigated.”
“But in truth, like the whole world is messy and organizations are messy. And in generally complex organizations, certainty is often fiction.”
“when, when, when I was speaking to a university president after I shared back my, my dissertation, they said, you know what, thank you for actually just even naming the mess, because it actually was so helpful in itself.”
Sensemaking
“So leadership is increasingly the view of making sense of the uncertainty that we're in, rather than simply making decisions.”
“And, Sensemaking is, is, is basically exploring all the different data that you're seeing, the emotions, the reactions of people, in order to bring people forward with them.”
“But it's, it's the work we do to actually understand what is going on so that we can decide what to do next.”
“But in some ways, it's like creating, you know, an online sort of Google map that's constantly being updated and refined with your, your own new information and, and new data as well.”
Letting go of control
“Yeah, I think we've been sold a bill of goods sometimes, Hugh, that, you know, leaders have got to be decisive and have certainty and have that power sort of a big personality as well. It's a bit of the cult of personality that we have actually been sold, I think.”
“So there's a culture that looks to leaders, well, you're supposed to have the answers, you're the leader.”
“you know, the serenity prayer is actually one thing that I actually, you know, think is extremely important for leaders.”
“there are things that, you know, we have no control over and we shouldn't try actually trying to control them. And that's where leaders, I think, most often get caught up.”
“That they're unable to, to actually hear, I say, the, the, the, the signals in the room that are actually, contrary to, to, to the direction they're going.”
Outer sensemaking and collaboration
“distributed leadership is needed and bringing people together and bringing people along, because that's what I think actually is, is required nowadays.”
“So, so, don't, don't get too far ahead of your people because you might be, thought of as an, as the enemy. So, so we have to make sure that actually leaders can actually be with the people, bringing people along, rather than out in front and ahead and trying to actually, you know, lead, I'd say.”
“And you do this through things like, you know, exploration and map making, where you actually gather all the data together, pull it all together, create a story.”
“people don't want to be told, they, they don't want to be, you know, you know, directed, they want to actually be brought along. And so, so that does require a, a new sense of collaboration.”
“just because you collaborate doesn't necessarily mean that, you know, you're going to get everyone on the same page, but people should understand what the direction is.”
Purpose as anchor
“a great Sensemaking leader does two things, you know, at the same time, and they're anchored, it's anchored by purpose, and that's the purpose of yourself, but also tied to the purpose of the institution you're leading as well.”
“I think it's important for leaders to understand, especially in nonprofit organizations or, or, or, or in, in, in, in clerical situations, that you're the steward. You're not the organization itself.”
Inner sensemaking and self-awareness
“It's about recognizing how you show up under stress. It's recognizing the biases that you have that you bring into the table as well. And it's also taking a pause you need to be able to understand things when, when things are going too quickly.”
“I think a lot of that is done through, you know, self-reflective activities, whether it's journaling, whether it's actually sending voice notes to yourself.”
“creating as well your own sort of personal resilience story about, you know, understanding when you had a point, and perhaps when you were at one of your low points, perhaps in your life or in your career, what did you do to actually, you know, you know, get out of that, right?”
“somebody, had described it quite well to me, I think, and they said the leader has to hold the uncertainty and tension on behalf of the organization.”
“organizations are all, you know, just, just collections of people. And as you say, one person's reaction has a multiple effect on, on, on those network of people that you're associated with.”
Strategic planning and subtraction
“So I think boards have to flip that around and say that, you know what, this, this strategic plan is actually for the organization, not for the person, and it should actually survive perhaps the position, the person in that position.”
“I'm not a huge flat, fan of these Massive five-year to ten-year strategic plans, especially done in academic institutions, there tend to be laundry lists of, of initiatives you're already doing, and they want to satisfy all the different sort of internal, stakeholders.”
“instead it's better to have a strategic plan that's, maybe three years long, and maybe it's actually directional with, with three, or four different sort of, sort of key things,”
“That's what I actually do in strategic planning. We got three, let's stay with three. You know, how much can we handle? And then we add one more thing, does it topple this, this whole, this whole house?”
“I think organizations, especially, you know, social purpose organizations, nonprofits, et cetera, have a problem with that art of subtraction, taking out things actually that, that are not necessarily perhaps as important today as they were last year,”
“So that's why that sort of map making and actually strategic planning should be ongoing rather than actually an exercise that goes once a year and gets blessed to the board.”
Leader as anchor
“Bowen says our anxiety is transmitted through the whole culture, and it comes back to us, and then we have triangles and relationships, and the anxiety goes around the triangles.”
Influences
“one is Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, and the other one is actually, you know, Adaptive Leadership, book, Leadership on the Line by, by, by, Heifetz and Minsky.”
Episode notes (as published)
From the episode notes The Nonprofit Exchange published with the episode.
Making Sense In the Mess: Leadership for a Turbulent Time Guest: Daniel Atlin Leadership in uncertain times is not about pretending to have all the answers. It is about helping people make sense of what is happening, stay grounded in purpose, and move forward together even when the path is unclear. In this episode of The Nonprofit Exchange, Hugh Ballou talks with Daniel Atlin, a strategic advisor, executive coach, and leadership researcher, about the growing importance of sensemaking in nonprofit and mission-driven leadership. Daniel explores why certainty is often an illusion in complex organizations and why leaders need to become more adaptive, collaborative, and self-aware. He explains the difference between inner sensemaking—understanding our own reactions, biases, stress, and resilience—and outer sensemaking—reading the people, systems, relationships, and changing conditions around us. The conversation also covers the importance of purpose as an anchor, the limitations of rigid strategic plans, and the “art of subtraction”—knowing what to stop doing so an organization can focus on what matters most. Daniel also shares practical leadership habits, including self-reflection, listening for signals that challenge our assumptions, and asking one powerful question: “What am I not seeing? What am I missing here?” This episode is especially valuable for nonprofit executives, clergy, board members, and other purpose-driven leaders who are navigating complexity, change, and uncertainty. Learn more about Daniel Atlin: Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Every quotation and passage on this page is copied word for word from the episode audio transcript and linked to the moment it was said. Quotations are never written or altered by AI; topic labels, passage notes and the episode analysis are AI-generated. Guest details come from the published episode notes or the guest's own words.
Enquire about a speaking engagement or strategic advisory with Daniel Atlin